IPMAT Rohtak 2024 Analysis

The Indian Institute of Management Rohtak (IIM Rohtak) conducted the Integrated Programme in Management Aptitude Test (IPMAT) for 2024. This analysis provides an overview of the test structure, including the sections, marking scheme, and key features of the exam.

Overall Analysis

The IPMAT Rohtak 2024 was a two-hour exam consisting of both multiple-choice questions (MCQs) and short-form answer questions. Here are the key features:

Total Duration: 120 minutes
Total Number of Questions: 120

Sections: The exam was divided into three sections:

• Quantitative Ability
• Verbal Ability
• Logical Reasoning

Marking Scheme:

• Each correct answer: +4 points
• Each incorrect answer: -1 point (negative marking)
• No use of an onscreen calculator was permitted.

Exam Pattern

The detailed pattern of the IPMAT Rohtak 2024 is as follows:

Section-wise 
Quantitative Ability
Number of Questions: 40
Total Marks: 160

This section tested mathematical skills, logical thinking, and problem-solving abilities. Topics typically included arithmetic, algebra, geometry, number theory, and basic statistics. Given the absence of a calculator, mental math skills and quick calculation abilities were crucial.

Verbal Ability
Number of Questions: 40
Total Marks: 160

This section assessed comprehension, vocabulary, grammar, and overall language proficiency. Questions could range from reading comprehension passages to sentence completion, para jumbles, and vocabulary-based queries.

Logical Reasoning
Number of Questions: 40
Total Marks: 160

The logical reasoning section focused on evaluating the candidate’s ability to think logically and analytically. It included questions on patterns, sequences, analogies, and critical reasoning.

Section-Wise Detail Analysis:

1. Quantitative Ability

The Quantitative Ability section of IPMAT Rohtak 2024 included questions from a range of topics. The difficulty level was generally categorized as easy to moderate, making it accessible yet challenging enough to differentiate among candidates.

Key Observations:

The distribution of questions was consistent with previous years.
Trigonometry questions were notably absent this year.
The questions spanned a variety of fundamental mathematical concepts.

Topic-Wise Distribution:

Here's a detailed breakdown of the number of questions from each topic:

Analysis:

• Averages & Mixtures (3 questions): These questions tested basic concepts of averages and mixtures, requiring candidates to calculate weighted averages and mixture proportions.
• ERPV (Equations, Ratios, Proportions, and Variations) (5 questions): This topic had a significant number of questions, focusing on solving linear equations, ratio and proportion problems, and variation principles.
• Functions (2 questions): Functions were tested through basic operations and understanding of their properties.
• Geometry & Mensuration (3 questions): This section included questions on basic geometrical shapes, area, volume, and properties of figures.
• Miscellaneous (2 questions): A couple of questions were categorized as miscellaneous, covering various less frequent topics.
• Numbers (4 questions): Questions in this area involved number theory, divisibility rules, and basic arithmetic properties.
• Permutations & Combinations (P&C) (3 questions): This section tested the fundamental principles of counting, permutations, and combinations.
• Percentages (1 question): A single question focused on calculating percentages and related applications.
• Probability (2 questions): Basic probability concepts were tested through simple probability problems.
• Profit & Loss (PPL) (3 questions): These questions involved calculating profit percentages, loss percentages, and related financial metrics.
• Quadratic Equations (3 questions): The quadratic equations were tested by solving for roots and understanding their properties.
• Simple & Compound Interest (SI CI) (4 questions): This section included both simple and compound interest calculations.
• Time & Distance (3 questions): These problems tested speed, distance, and time relationships.
• Time & Work (2 questions): Questions here involved calculations based on work done, efficiency, and time required.

Conclusion:

The Quantitative Ability section was well-balanced, covering a wide array of topics essential for assessing the mathematical and analytical skills of candidates. The absence of trigonometry made the section slightly easier for those less inclined towards higher mathematics, but the inclusion of diverse topics ensured a comprehensive evaluation. Regular practice and a good understanding of basic concepts would have been key to scoring well in this section.

Section-Wise Detail Analysis:
2.Logical Reasoning

The Logical Reasoning section of IPMAT Rohtak 2024 was comprehensive and relatively more time-consuming compared to the Quantitative Ability section. It tested a wide array of logical reasoning skills, assessing candidates' ability to think analytically and critically.

Key Observations:
Covered a diverse range of logical reasoning topics.
More time-consuming compared to the Quantitative Ability section, requiring careful reading and analysis.

Topic-Wise Distribution:
Here's a detailed breakdown of the number of questions from each topic:

Analysis:

• Analogies (2 questions): Tested the ability to identify relationships between pairs of words or concepts.
• Blood Relations (2 questions): Required determining relationships within family structures based on given information.
• Calendars (2 questions): Focused on calculating days, dates, and understanding calendar concepts.
• Clocks (2 questions): Involved solving problems related to time, angles, and clock positions.
• Coding-Decoding (2 questions): Evaluated understanding of patterns and rules in coded language.
• Cubes (2 questions): Tested spatial reasoning and understanding of three-dimensional objects.
• Data Sufficiency (2 questions): Assessed the ability to determine whether given data is sufficient to answer a question.
• Data Interpretation (DI) (7 questions in 2 sets): Included interpreting and analyzing data from charts, graphs, and tables.
• Puzzles (2 questions): Required logical reasoning to solve complex puzzle scenarios.
• Quant-based reasoning (2 questions): Involved mathematical reasoning within logical problems.
• Seating Arrangement (3 questions): Focused on arranging people or objects according to given conditions.
• Series (2 questions): Tested the ability to identify patterns in sequences of numbers or letters.
• Statement-Conclusions (3 questions): Evaluated the ability to draw logical conclusions from given statements.
• Strong & Weak Arguments (2 questions): Assessed the ability to distinguish between strong and weak arguments in given scenarios.
• Syllogisms (3 questions): Tested logical deductions based on given premises.

Conclusion:

The Logical Reasoning section was diverse, covering almost all major topics in logical reasoning. The questions, while mostly easy to moderate in difficulty, required careful thought and analysis, making this section more time-consuming than the Quantitative Ability section. Success in this section would have depended on strong analytical skills, practice with various types of logical reasoning questions, and effective time management.

Section-Wise Detail Analysis:
3.Verbal Ability

The Verbal Ability section of IPMAT Rohtak 2024 was similar to previous years, featuring a range of questions that tested candidates' proficiency in English language skills. The difficulty level was easy to moderate, making it accessible for well-prepared students.

Key Observations:

The section was straightforward, aligning with the patterns observed in previous years.
Candidates familiar with the exam format and who have practiced through mock tests found this section manageable.

Topic-Wise Distribution:
Here's a detailed breakdown of the number of questions from each topic:

Analysis:

• Idioms & Phrases (4 questions): Tested the understanding of common idioms and phrases and their correct usage in sentences.
• Para Formation Questions (4 questions): Required rearranging sentences to form a coherent paragraph.
• Para Formation Questions (One-Missing-Out) (3 questions): Involved identifying the sentence that did not fit within a given paragraph.
• Reading Comprehension (RC) (8 questions in 2 passages): Assessed comprehension skills, including the ability to understand and interpret passages, draw inferences, and answer related questions.
• Sentence Correction (4 questions): Focused on identifying and correcting grammatical errors in sentences.
• Spellings (3 questions): Tested the ability to recognize correctly and incorrectly spelled words.
• Strong & Weak Arguments (2 questions): Evaluated the ability to differentiate between strong and weak arguments within a given context.
• Vocabulary - Fill in the Blanks (5 questions): Required selecting the correct words to complete sentences appropriately.
• Vocabulary - Synonyms/Antonyms (4 questions): Involved identifying words with similar or opposite meanings.
• Vocabulary - Word Replacement (3 questions): Focused on replacing words in sentences with appropriate synonyms.

Overall Analysis:

The IPMAT Rohtak 2024 exam maintained the same structure and difficulty level as the previous year, featuring predictable patterns across all sections. This consistency benefits candidates who have extensively practiced with mock tests, making the exam familiar and manageable for them.

Key Takeaways:

Quantitative Ability: Covered a range of topics, with a notable absence of trigonometry. The difficulty level was easy to moderate.

Logical Reasoning: Comprehensive and time-consuming, covering a wide array of topics with easy to moderate difficulty.

Verbal Ability: Straightforward with a focus on common verbal reasoning topics. The difficulty level was easy to moderate.

Predictions on Cutoff:

The cutoff marks are expected to be similar to the previous year, given the consistency in difficulty level.
If the number of candidates shortlisted for the online personal interview increases, the cutoff may slightly decrease.
Candidates who have prepared well and practiced through mock tests would have found the exam manageable, with no significant surprises in any section.